Thursday, August 2, 2012

HPV Test Beats Pap Long-Term: Study

HealthDay – 13 hrs ago MONDAY, July 30 (HealthDay News) -- Testing for HPV, the human papillomavirus linked to cervical cancer, can predict which women will stay cancer-free for a decade or more, a new study shows.

While both a positive HPV test and an abnormal result on a traditional Pap smear predicted which women would get precancerous lesions within two years of testing, the HPV test continued to predict which women were at risk for 10 to 18 years later, said study co-author Dr. Attila Lorincz, a professor of molecular epidemiology at Queen Mary University of London.

"HPV DNA testing detects more cervical precancers than the Pap test, and women who are negative for high-risk HPV DNA have improved protection from the risk of cervical cancer," Lorincz said.

The study, which looked at nearly 20,000 women receiving routine Pap tests and HPV testing at Kaiser Permanente in Portland, Ore., is published in the July 30 issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

The research does not suggest one test should replace the other, Lorincz stressed, but confirms the importance of both screenings. The main aims of the study, he said, "were to see how many extra cases of precancer can be discovered by the additional use of HPV DNA testing as compared to routine Pap testing."

The findings, he said, support recently revised guidelines suggesting that HPV testing, if negative, can allow for longer intervals between Pap testing for women over the age of 30. The findings also suggest that an alternate strategy, using HPV testing first, may work well, the researchers said.

According to American Cancer Society guidelines, the preferred screening for healthy women aged 30 to 65 is to do a Pap and HPV test every five years. Women under 30 are often infected with HPV, but clear it spontaneously. That is why the guidelines for the roles of HPV and Pap testing combined are for women aged 30 and older.

As more research is done, guidelines may change, said study co-author Dr. Andrew Glass, senior investigator at Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research. "It is likely that HPV testing will be more and more common and may in the future replace routine Pap testing," he said.

Both the Pap test and the HPV test are done on samples of cells taken from the cervix. The Pap detects cell changes on the cervix that could become cancer if not treated appropriately.

HPV tests look for DNA, or genetic material, of the virus that can lead to precancerous changes.

In the study, women over 30 with a positive HPV at the start were more likely to have a precancer or cancer during the 10- to 18-year follow-up than those who had an abnormal Pap.

Women who tested positive for the two strains of HPV most strongly linked with cervical cancer were more likely to have precancer during the follow-up than HPV-negative women, regardless of their initial Pap test result.

Having a negative HPV more strongly predicted who would remain cancer-free than the Pap did, the investigators found.

The researchers also looked at the effect of lengthening the screening interval from three years to five in women over 30 who had negative HPV and normal Pap tests. Doing this did not increase the risk of precancer and cancers appreciably.

Both tests are commonly covered by insurance plans, sometimes requiring a co-payment. The typical cost for each test is about $40 to $70, according to Lorincz.

The study finding "confirms the fact that you don't have to do a Pap smear every year in healthy women over 30," said Dr. Mark Wakabayashi, director of the division of gynecologic oncology at the City of Hope, in Duarte, Calif.

However, he stressed the importance of checking in with a doctor. "But you have to talk to someone who understands who does need a yearly Pap," he said. "This

View the Original article

Watch: Spinal Cord Injuries: Life Changes in an Instant

NYPD Officer Talks Man Out of Bridge...More Popular VideoUK's All-Male Synchronized Swim Team Left Out...U.S. Bridges, Roads Being Built by Chinese...Mitt Romney: Fallout Continues in PolandOlympic Games 2012: French Beat Michael...James Holmes Charged With 24 Counts of MurderIn The NewsU.S.PoliticsEntertainmentWeird and WackySpinal Cord Injuries: Life Changes in an InstantThe Miami Project aims to find a cure for paralysis.07/30/2012Share:

View the Original article

The men's 100 meters: How fast could they go?

'modId':'mediasocialchromefriends','isPreLoad':0,'pageSize':12,'numFriends':null,'notificationCount':0,'property':'News','learnMorePath':'/activity-learn-more/','friendbarNotification':'0','friendbarRollup':'0','moduleConf':YAHOO.Media.Facebook.ModuleConf,'friendIdList':

View the Original article

Does nature or nurture make a top sprinter?

Reuters – 3 hrs ago LONDON (Reuters) - The dominance of Jamaicans and Americans of west African and Caribbean descent in world class sprinting has sparked intense debate about whether running at speeds that push the limits of what is humanly possible is all in the genes.

It is an idea that has its attractions. After all, it does seem baffling that the tiny island nation of Jamaica with a population reaching barely 2.8 million can consistently produce world-beating sprinters, while the whole of Europe can hardly register more than a handful of athletes in the top 100.

Yet sports scientists and geneticists say pinning sprinting success purely on nature rather than nurture is overly simplistic and ignores a wealth of cultural and societal factors that are equally important to beating the clock.

"What we know about genes in sport is that genetic make-up accounts for about 50 percent of variability in baseline performance," said Ken van Someren, director of sports science at the English Institute of Sport.

"What that basically tells is that sports performance is a combination of both nature and nurture."

SPRINTING GENES?

Bengt Saltin, a professor of human physiology at the University of Copenhagen's Muscle Research Centre in Denmark, says the balance of fast twitch to slow twitch muscles is key.

Fast twitch fibers produce the same amount of force for each contraction as slow muscles, but they get their name because they can fire far more rapidly - making them better for explosive, fast and forceful sports such as the 100m final.

And while training and practice can obviously improve muscle performance, evidence suggests slow twitch fibers cannot be converted into fast twitch, meaning that what athletes have is what their genes gave them.

"If you don't have at least 70 to 80 percent fast twitch muscle fibers, I'd say it's unlikely you could be among them (the world's top sprinters)," Saltin told Reuters.

"But if you have that kind of level you could probably do well - and if you have 80 to 90 percent that's even better."

A flurry of excitement about the idea of genes for athletics prowess took off in 2003 when Australian scientists found that a gene called ACTN3 has certain variants which may give the muscles of elite athletes a performance advantage.

Their study, published in the American Journal of Human Genetics, found that ACTN3 could give sprinters a boost because it gave extra power to fast twitch muscles.

Studies show this version of ACTN3 - dubbed the "sprint gene" - is more common in Jamaicans and other people of West African descent than in people of European ancestry.

Scientists are keen to point out, however, while the "right" kind of genotype is likely to be more prevalent among successful sprinters, for example, than among the general population, there is also likely to be wide variation between genetic profiles of those at the top of the sport.

"The closer towards elite you get, and the closer towards the limits of performance, so genetic make-up may well put some sort of glass ceiling there," said van Someren.

"But there is no single gene that accounts for speed and power, or for sprinting. From what we know so far it appears to be a really complex interaction of lots of genes.

So it's impossible to say there's a west African genotype for sprinting, or an east African genotype for endurance running. Genes only play a part."

BEYOND THE GENOME

Scientist say any gene-centered explanation also dismisses the importance of a whole host of psycho-social and cultural factors that are likely to be major contributors to the success of Jamaican sprinters.

Track and field holds a position of high respect in Jamaica. The annual school athletics championships, known as Champs, is a major national event whose significance ranks with the Super Bowl for Americans or the FA Cup final for the English.

Experts also note Jamaica's investment in an infrastructure and training system to pick out and nurture potential elite track athletes, a culture that idolizes sprint heroes, and a powerful desire among young Jamaicans to use sport to lift themselves and their families out of poverty.

"They have role models and opportunities, it's a fun, sociable and competitive event from a very early age, and it has great rewards, both financial and social," said van Someren.

Daniel MacArthur, one of the researchers who published the 2003 paper linking ACTN3 and sprinting performance, says he regrets the study has led to far too much emphasis being put on what some like to see as an evolutionary advantage.

"It is almost certainly true that Usain Bolt carries at least one of the 'sprint' variants of the ACTN3 gene," he wrote in a science blog about the issue. "But then so do I - along with around 5 billion other humans worldwide.

"That doesn't mean you'll see me in the 100 meter final in London in 2012. Unfortunately for me, it takes a lot more than one lucky gene to create an Olympian."

(Editing by Alastair Himmer)



View the Original article

Training the brain for a mind-blowing 100 final

Reuters – 2 hrs 49 mins ago LONDON (Reuters) - It is hard to believe a race that lasts barely 10 seconds can seriously mess up your mind but when it is the Olympic 100 meters final, there is little doubt it can.

Intrusive thoughts about failure and humiliation can plague sprinters for months before a race. The constant stress then starts to interfere with hormones in the brain, making sleep, concentration and training suffer.

As Jamaicans Asafa Powell and Usain Bolt know well, one false start can wreck hopes before a race has even begun and haunt the psyche for years.

While endless honing of fitness and form is crucial for the world's fastest human beings, it may be brain training that makes the difference between glory and defeat.

"By the time they reach this level, elite athletes are fit, they're fast, they've done their homework, they know who they're up against. So it's hardly ever a skills issue," said Pieter Kruger, a London-based sports psychologist who has worked with many elite athletes including the 2012 British Olympic team.

"At this point it becomes about the application of skills under pressure - that's where the psychology comes in."

On the face of it, the men most likely to be lining up for the 100 final on Sunday August 5 seem very different.

Sprint king Bolt, a laid back, light-hearted showman, is rarely lacking in confidence and appears far more relaxed than compatriot Powell - a known worrier who has struggled to get over pre-race nerves in the past.

America's fastest man Tyson Gay is softly spoken and humble, keen to avoid bold predictions and pre-race posturing.

He has found the psychological aspects of training, especially when coming back after an injury, particularly tough.

"When you're a little bit banged up it plays on you mentally a lot because you realize you only need to be 100 percent, feeling good, for one race - and that's the final," he said.

Powell knows he must ignore his rivals and focus on his own performance.

"I should just stay composed and run to the finish line," he told Reuters earlier this year. "You don't want any doubts in your head.

CONTROL THE CONTROLLABLES

Sports psychologists agree that is exactly the right approach but is far easier said than done.

"One of the worst things athletes have to deal with is something called anticipatory anxiety," explained Kruger.

"These are very intrusive thoughts. They start in the weeks leading up to a big race and they're often very much focused on outcome goals - in other words 'I need to win, I've spent four years training for this, I don't want to fail'."

If athletes cannot get a grip on these fears, they build to a point that produces a state of almost continual stress, triggering a constant secretion of the stress hormones cortisol and adrenaline in the body.

"That can really interfere with sleep patterns, recovery, training, rest - and when we're talking about milliseconds of difference between a first and a fifth place, all these things become incredibly important," said Kruger.

What team psychologists and coaches need to do is help athletes redirect those thoughts towards the process rather than the outcome, so their minds are focused on how to run their best race, not on obsessing about whether or not they can win.

"It's about controlling the controllables," said Kruger. "You can't control the outcome but you can control everything else in the process."

In a list of the top 10 questions an athlete must be able to answer correctly, American 400 meters great Michael Johnson said a crucial one is "What really matters right now?"

The answer? "The only thing that matters is the race you are about to run. The focus required to compete at this level and under this pressure requires an athlete to be totally in the moment".

Damon Burton and Thomas Raedeke, authors of "Sports Psychology for Coaches" suggest sprinters should have a clear race plan, possibly with cue words for each phase, and should mentally rehearse their race until it becomes second nature.

"Thinking too much is the worst possible thing they can do psychologically," said Burton, a professor of sport psychology at University of Idaho in the United States.

"You want sprinters in that situation to keep their minds clear, stick to a routine, react to the gun, and just do what they can do as best as they possibly can," he said in a telephone interview.

"The worst thing is if they start having nagging self doubts in the back of their minds."

So far at least, Bolt seems to have got that message.

"I have no worries," he told Reuters on Thursday. "It is not over-confidence. I know what I can do."

(Editing by Justin Palmer)



View the Original article

Ugandans try to avoid touching amid ebola outbreak

"Officials from the World Health Organization wear protective clothing last week as they prepare to enter Kagadi Hospital in Kibale District, about 200 kilometres from Kampala, where an outbreak of ebola virus started. President Yoweri Museveni on Monday confirmed that Ebola, one of the world's most virulent diseases, has reached Kampala for the first time. (AFP Photo/Isaac Kasamani)" title

View the Original article

Revealing the Psychology of Playing Card Magic

Scientific American – 2 hrs 34 mins ago Think of a playing card. Got one in mind?

Although it may have felt like a free choice, think again: Most people choose one of only four cards, out of a deck of 52. For now, remember your card

View the Original article

Scientists skeptical as athletes get all taped up

Reuters – 2 hrs 17 mins ago LONDON (Reuters) - German beach volleyball player Ilka Semmler wears it on her buttocks - in pink. Swedish handball player Johanna Wiberg prefers it in blue from her knee to her groin. British sprinter Dwain Chambers has even worn it with a Union Jack design.

Athletic tape made in every color under the sun seems to be the latest must-have sports injury treatment at London 2012, where athletes may have been influenced by other big name tape fans such as Serena Williams and David Beckham.

Called Kinesio tape and developed by a Japanese doctor more than 30 years ago, the adhesive strapping is designed to provide muscle and joint support without restricting movement.

According to Kinesio's product website, it is also designed to be used with a particular taping technique - a skill practitioners need to learn on a special training course.

More than 4,000 people in Britain are now trained in the art of Kinesio taping, it says, and many of them look after some of the country's top sportsmen and women.

But does it really work?

Compared with the abundance of its use, rigorous scientific research on Kinesio tape is scant. But a handful of research papers suggest its ability to relieve pain or improve muscle strength is limited.

"Kinesio tape may be of some assistance to clinicians in improving pain-free active range of movement immediately after tape application for patients with shoulder pain," wrote scientists in one study published in the Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physiotherapy.

But the researchers added their findings did not support the use of Kinesio tape for decreasing pain intensity or disability in patients with shoulder problems.

SCIENTIFICALLY SUPPORTED?

In a review of all the scientific research so far, published in the Sports Medicine journal in February, researchers found "little quality evidence to support the use of Kinesio tape over other types of elastic taping in the management or prevention of sports injuries".

Kevin Anderson, managing director of Kinesio UK, which supplies the tape in Britain and trains people in how to apply it, says the scientific research has yet to catch up with what athletes and physiotherapists say about the tape's benefits.

"There's a lot more needed on the research side to confirm the positive results we're seeing so far," he told Reuters.

"There's nothing magical in the tape, it certainly can't improve your performance or make you into Superman, but the way people use the tape is to lift the skin, reduce the pressure and that helps relieve pain and swelling."

Whatever the science, German beach volleyball player Sara Goller sported two long pink strips of the tape on her left leg during matches on Tuesday, while her partner Laura Ludwig had two vertical blue strips on her stomach.

"I don't really mind the color, it's more about what it does. It can release or put tension on a muscle, it depends on what you want. Our physio is really good at doing it," Goller told Reuters.

FADS, FASHIONS AND PLACEBOS

John Brewer, a professor of sports science at Britain's University of Bedfordshire, remains doubtful.

"As a scientist, I'm still not convinced about the underlying mechanisms," he told Reuters, voicing skepticism about the supposed 'lifting' effect and the ability of tape applied to the skin to enhance the performance of muscles deep inside the body.

Steve Harridge, a professor of human and applied physiology at King's College London, said many athletes appeared to be wearing tape even when they had no injury, possible hoping for some preventative or enhancing effect.

"It may be a fashion accessory, and it may be just one of those fads that come along from time to time, but to my knowledge there's no firm scientific evidence to suggest it will enhance muscle performance," he told Reuters.

Both scientists agreed, however, that there may be a benefit, in the form of the placebo effect.

"The fact that athletes think it's going to do them some good can help in a psychological way," said Harridge.

An effective placebo, Brewer said, "could make all the difference between success and failure".

(Additional reporting by Ross Chainey, Thomas Pilcher and Nigel Hunt, editing by Mark Trevelyan)



View the Original article

Watch: Cancer Survivor Loses Hands, Feet to Bacterial Infection

NYPD Officer Talks Man Out of Bridge...More Popular VideoUK's All-Male Synchronized Swim Team Left Out...U.S. Bridges, Roads Being Built by Chinese...Mitt Romney: Fallout Continues in PolandOlympic Games 2012: French Beat Michael...James Holmes Charged With 24 Counts of MurderIn The NewsU.S.PoliticsEntertainmentWeird and WackyCancer Survivor Loses Hands, Feet to Bacterial InfectionHannah Rinehart, 32, is fighting capnocytophaga after surviving cancer three times.01:18

View the Original article

Health Tip: Managing Workplace Stress

HealthDay – 1 hr 50 mins ago (HealthDay News) -- No one's job is stress-free. But it's important to curtail workplace stress as much as possible to help quash possible side effects, including weight gain, high blood pressure and increased risk of heart attack.

The American Council on Exercise says you can help reduce workplace stress by:

Not worrying about previous assignments and how you could have done better. Instead, focus on the tasks in front of you.Being friendly and smiling at work, and making some time for friendly conversations with co-workers.Communicating clearly with others to avoid misunderstandings and frustration.Staying positive, and not dwelling solely on problems.Eating well and exercising.Communicating frequently with your manager.Exploring other opportunities -- if you are very unhappy at work and don't see a possible resolution.

View the Original article

Health Tip: Hiking or Running on a Trail

HealthDay – 1 hr 50 mins ago (HealthDay News) -- If you're tired of the same running routine and the same old scenery, consider a new hiking or running trial.

The American Council on Exercise makes these recommendations before you hit the trail for the first time:

Hike a new trail before you run it, familiarizing yourself with the new layout.Don't walk or run a trail alone.Carry a communication device, such as a walkie-talkie or cell phone.Take a small, basic first aid kit that includes bandages, tape, a knife and antibacterial ointment.Make sure any weight you carry is evenly distributed; try to carry most of the weight around your hips.When going downhill, keep knees bent and don't lean back too far. Use short strides when hills are steep.Run with your head up and push your arms from the shoulders, rather than from the elbows.

View the Original article

Love Knows No Gender Difference

HealthDay – 1 hr 50 mins ago TUESDAY, July 31 (HealthDay News) -- Think married men and women show their love in vastly different ways? Not necessarily.

Although popular culture reinforces the stereotype that there's a gender gap when it comes to expressing affection, few studies have actually tested the notion.

A small new study suggests, however, that men are just as likely as women to be openly affectionate. The study, which also identified some differences between the sexes, was published recently in the journal Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

"Men and women are actually more similar in the ways they express love than they are different," said study author Elizabeth Schoenfeld, a researcher at the University of Texas in Austin. "But we also learned that, even in the wake of feminism, wives express love by being less assertive and more accommodating, while husbands show love by initiating sex or sharing activities together."

The study involved 168 couples in first marriages living in rural central Pennsylvania. Data was collected in initial interviews, followed by telephone interviews in which husbands and wives separately reported activities and interactions. The interviews occurred within two months of when each couple was married and then annually, with a final set of interviews conducted after 13 years of marriage.

At the conclusion of the study, 105 of the original couples were still married, three were widowed and 56 were divorced. Almost all of the participants were white, and more than half had a high school education.

Contrary to some common gender stereotypes, the research showed that the more men loved their wives, the more likely they were to be affectionate. They were also more likely to involve their spouses in their leisure activities and in household chores. Love did not, however, mean a husband did more chores around the house or was more eager to relieve his wife of the chores for which she was responsible.

The researchers found, in general, that a husband's love may create an environment in which the couple does a variety of things together. The more husbands loved their wives, the more likely they were to initiate sex. For wives, though, increased love for their husbands meant they were actually less likely to make the first move.

Why would that be? "If a wife is feeling unloved, it could be that she is attempting to kick-start the marriage," Schoenfeld said.

Wives' love was less associated with interest in joint activities, and relied more on expressions of love. More love also was associated with greater accommodation to husbands' moods and needs.

"Biting their tongues, letting men initiate sex more often, showing a willingness to allow men to assert themselves a little more -- this is what we saw when women were more in love," Schoenfeld explained.

Some experts believe differences between men and women in marriage are typically overemphasized.

"There aren't too many real gender and sex differences between men and women on the whole," said Stevie Yap, a researcher in the department of psychology at Michigan State University in East Lansing. "If you look at the overall research, gender differences don't usually hold up."

Yap, who recently published research on happiness and marriage in the Journal of Research and Personality, found that although matrimony doesn't tend to make people happier than they were when they were single, it appears to protect against declines in happiness that can occur in adulthood.

Yap said only a few gender differences actually have been shown by research to be real: men tend to be physically stronger and more sexually active, and have a greater tendency toward aggression. He said that even these three characteristics, however, can be affected by socialization and experience.

Schoenfeld, too, thinks differences between the sexes have been exaggerated.

"Don't be fooled by popular stereotypes," she said. "Men are not from Mars and women are not from Venus. We are all on planet Earth."

More information

For more on marriage, visit the National Healthy Marriage Resource Center.



View the Original article